Doorway Capital Ltd v American International Group UK Ltd [2022] EWHC 182 (Comm)

There was no right to indemnity under a policy written under the Solicitors Regulation Authority Minimum Terms and Conditions for a claim relating to the firm’s funding as the claim did not arise from the provision of services in private practice as a solicitor. Sutherland Professional Funding Ltd v Bakewells [2011] EWHC 2658 (QB) and Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v Barrington Support Services Ltd [2013] EWHC 4005 (QB) considered. Obiter, the trading debt exclusion would have applied.

See here.

‹ Back to News